Foundations
Foundations: Prompt cards that survive handoffs
Draft, stress-test, and archive prompts so the next operator knows exactly what changed between versions.
Two-day live block (12 hours) · Hybrid (Seoul room + remote) · 420,000 KRW
A two-day live block built for mixed English-speaking teams in Korea who touch AI weekly but lack a shared template. You will rehearse three real briefs, annotate failure modes, and export a prompt card pack your leads can drop into Confluence without re-explaining context windows.
What is included
- Live teardown of vague vs. scoped instructions
- Peer review grid borrowed from editorial desks
- Versioning labels that map to your activity log
- Warm-up drills for multilingual teams
- Quality standards checklist aligned to stakeholder sign-off
- Quiet async hour with instructor voice notes
Outcomes
- A five-card starter library tagged by intent
- A reuse policy your managers can endorse
- One async critique loop template
Leo Park
Lead instructor focused on operational writing and critique culture.
Participant questions
Do you cover model selection?
We touch provider differences at a high level, but the focus stays on writing and review rituals—not vendor procurement.
Is this only for engineers?
No. Marketing, ops, and program leads attend together; exercises assume mixed literacy.
What is not included?
We do not build production integrations or write policy for your organization; bring internal counsel if you need binding rules.
Notes from recent seats
The handoff cards alone justified the seat; our night shift stopped improvising tone from scratch.
Clear pacing, though I wanted one more hour on multilingual edge cases.